我国侦查结构及其完善——以2012年刑诉法修正为背景  

The Structure of Criminal Investigation and Its Perfection:On the Background of Amendment of 2012 Criminal Procedural Law

作　　者：蒋鹏飞[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210046 [2]安徽财经大学法学院,安徽蚌埠233030

出　　处：《山东警察学院学报》2012年第6期80-88,共9页Journal of Shandong Police College

基　　金：安徽省法学会2011年课题<"抽象犯罪嫌疑人"权益保障研究>(编号:201103)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：随着2012年刑事诉讼法的修正,我国侦查程序的结构得到一定程度的完善,但是依然存在着不合理之处,如侦查程序主体地位虚化、控辩对抗不足与缺乏中立的审查机关等。为进一步合理化改造侦查结构,我国应当确立侦查机关独立行使侦查权的原则、保障犯罪嫌疑人的主体地位、强化控辩对抗与强调公安机关、检察机关的客观公正义务等。With the amendment of 2012 Criminal Procedural Law, the structure of investigation procedures has been perfected to a certain degree, but there are still some unreasonable defects, such as debased position of the subjects of investigation procedure, insufficiency of confrontation between prosecution and defense, lack of neutral examining authority. For the purpose of further streamlining the structure of investigation in China, the principle that investigation organs exercise power of investigation independently should be established, the subject position of criminal suspects should be ensured, the confrontation between prosecution and defense should be strengthened, and the objective and impartial obligations of public security organs and prosecution organs should be emphasized.

关 键 词：侦查结构 刑事诉讼法 侦查程序 人权保障 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学]