检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尹逊强[1] 梁颖[2] 谭红专[1] 龚雯洁[1] 邓静[1] 罗家有[1] 狄晓康[1] 武越[1]
机构地区:[1]中南大学公共卫生学院,长沙410078 [2]新疆医科大学公共卫生学院,乌鲁木齐830054
出 处:《中南大学学报(医学版)》2012年第11期1104-1107,共4页Journal of Central South University :Medical Science
基 金:卫生部卫生标准制定项目(20080282-Q-361)~~
摘 要:目的:利用改良德尔菲法制定学校卫生标准,探讨该法在卫生标准制定中的可行性及优势。方法:通过两轮专家咨询,收集专家意见,利用SPSS15.0进行数据统计与分析,筛选学校卫生标准的指标。结果:共有32名专家完成了两轮咨询,专家工作年限为(24.69±8.53)年,专家的权威系数为0.729±0.172;前后两轮的专家积极系数分别为94.12%和100%,第2轮咨询中各指标必要性、可行性、合理性的协调系数分别为0.493(P<0.05),0.527(P<0.01),0.535(P<0.01),说明专家的认识已趋于一致;依据第2轮咨询结果,按照预定的纳入标准,最终有38项三级指标进入学生宿舍卫生标准框架。结论:学校卫生标准的制定除了目前常用的理论分析、文献查阅、现场调查等方法外,德尔菲法不失为一种快速、有效、可行的方法。Objective: To constitute school sanitation standard using modified Delphi method, and to explore the feasibility and the predominance of Delphi method in the constitution of school sanitation standard. Methods: Two rounds of expert consultations were adopted in this study. The data were analyzed with SPSS 15.0 to screen indices of school sanitation standard. Results: Thirty-two experts accomplished the 2 rounds of consultations. The average length of expert service was (24.69+8.$3) years. The authority coefficient was 0.729~0.172. The expert positive coefficient was 94.12% (32/34) in the first round and 100% (32/32) in the second round. The harmonious coefficients of importance, feasibility and rationality in the second round were 0.493 (P〈0.05), 0.527 (P〈0.01), and O.S3S (P〈0.01), respectively, suggesting unanimous expert opinions. According to the second round of consultation, 38 indices were included in the framework. Conclusion: The oretical analysis, literature review, investigation and so on are generally used in healthstandard constitution currentl)n Delphi method is a rapid, effective and feasible method in this field.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.173