检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾于生[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学法学院,上海200433
出 处:《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年第6期103-108,151-152,共6页Journal of East China Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
摘 要:公益诉讼是一种不同于传统私人诉讼模式的一种全新类型的诉讼,是民众干预公共生活的一种新的制度储备。在这一概念的界定中,应当以"诉讼请求分析法"来区分公益诉讼和私益诉讼,前者的诉讼请求中应以确认性请求、停止侵害请求为主。公益诉讼具有唤起民众对公共事务的关心、促进"休眠状态"法律法规执行,制止违法行为的未来发生和促进公益组织发展等诸多功能。我国现阶段并不存在真正意义上的"行政公益诉讼"。Public interest litigation is a new type of litigation different from traditional private litigation. It also provides a new system in which the common people can influence the public life. In definition, public interest litigation and private interest litigation should be distinguished according to 'litigation request analysis'. The requests of public interest litigation should mainly be confirmation request or the request to stop infringements. Public interest litigation has many functions such as arousing the common people’s care for public affairs, making 'dormant' laws and regulations to execute, stopping illegal acts in future and promoting the development of public welfare organizations. However, there is no real 'administrative public interest litigation' in today’s China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28