白话新诗之争——论学衡派的诗歌观  

Criticism of Vernacular Poetry:On Xueheng School's View of Poetry

作　　者：李广琼[1] 

机构地区：[1]华南理工大学新闻与传播学院,广东广州510006

出　　处：《华南理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第6期69-73,共5页Journal of South China University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学项目:学衡派与新人文主义中国化(08JC75017);中央高校专项资金华南理工大学重点项目:媒介传播与社会时尚互动关系研究(2009SZ0009)

摘　　要：在新文化运动白话诗歌的论争中,学衡派对白话诗歌批评集中在白话可否入诗,以及格律可否偏废这两个主要方面。学衡派认为诗歌语言应是工具和本体的统一,反对白话入诗;认为格律为诗之本能,诗歌必须坚持格律;坚持"以新材料入旧格律"的诗歌改革观点。学衡派的诗歌观与其文化思想有内在逻辑关系,与新人文主义思想中的古典主义"一、多"学说有渊源关系。In the debates about the vernacular of the New Culture Movement, the criticism of Xueheng School fo-cused on two major aspects including the possibility of the vernacular and the metrical inform. They insisted that poetic language should be unity of tools and ontology, and poems should have metrical. Their views intrinsically linked to the ＂a- multi＂ theory of Classical Marxism of the New Humanism. There are logics between their views about poetry reform and cultural thought.

关 键 词：学衡派 诗歌观 白话新诗 

分 类 号：I209[文学—中国文学]