检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林志安[1] 张清罗[1] 侯如蓉[1] 潘惠敏[1]
机构地区:[1]厦门大学附属中山医院肿瘤放疗科,361004
出 处:《实用癌症杂志》2012年第6期615-617,共3页The Practical Journal of Cancer
摘 要:目的探讨增强造影剂对食管癌调强放疗计划的影响。方法对10例食管癌进行CT平扫与增强造影,分别设计调强放疗计划,比较2个计划靶区剂量分布和危及器官的剂量体积受量。结果增强影像计划的靶区最大剂量、最小剂量、平均剂量及中位剂量,较平扫影像计划的平均高30 cGy,适形度指数和均匀性指数的比较无差异,增强影像计划的双肺平均剂量、心脏平均剂量受量高。2种计划的双肺V20、V30和脊髓最大剂量比较无差异。结论造影剂对食管癌调强放疗剂量有影响,但影响较小,可以直接在增强影像上设计放疗计划。Objective To evaluate the effect of contrast agent on IMRT treatment plan for esophageal carcinoma.Methods Ten patients of esophageal carcinoma treated with IMRT,were planned by CT image with contrast agent or not.Isodose distribution of PTV and dose-volume histogram of organ at risk were compared.Results The maximum dose、the minimum dose、 the mean dose and the median dose of PTV have a mean increase of 30 cGy in plan with contrast agent than in plan without contrast agent.No significant difference was found in the maximum dose of spinal cord、the V20 and V30 of lung 、the conformal index and the homogeneity index between the two plans.The mean dose of heart and lung were spared more in plan without contrast agent.Conclusion On the IMRT treatment plan for esophageal carcinoma,contrast agent has little effect and can be neglected.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30