检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马明亮[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学法律系
出 处:《北方法学》2012年第6期136-142,共7页Northern Legal Science
基 金:2009年度国家社会科学基金重大项目"中国特色社会主义司法制度研究"(项目编号09&ZD062)的子课题阶段性成果
摘 要:我国之所以出现法院对地方政府的依赖以及地方政府对法院审判权的不当干预现象,根本原因在于目前法院的"人财物"管理方式存在制度性缺陷,即法院行政化的人事制度、依赖政府财政拨款的经费保障制度与现代审判权的运行规律存有内在冲突。它"后台"式地消解着法院的独立性,必须建立以符合法官职业特性和审判权运行规律的"人财物"管理制度,这是审判权独立运行的基石。At present in our country, courts rely on local governments to some extent and the latter im- properly intermeddle with the judiciary power of the former. The core cause of such phenomena lies in an insti- tutional defect of management as to the “personnel, fund and property” of the court. Specifically, inner con- flicts arise among the court' s human resource system with administrative nature ; the court' s relying on gov- ernmental fiscal appropriation as fund guarantee; and the exercising rules of modern judiciary power. The in- dependence of the court has been dissolved from the “backyard”. Thus, it is suggested to set up such a man- agement system for the “personnel, fund and property”as conforming to the professional feature of judges and exercising rules of judiciary power, which is the cornerstone of the court's independent exercise of their judi- ciary power.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.141.193