比较法在病理解剖学实验教学中的实践效果评价  

Practical efficacy of applying comparison method in experimental teaching of pathological anato- my

作　　者：郑玉锋[1] 陈光平[1] 陈吴兴[1] 叶宁海[1] 汪晓庆[1] 

机构地区：[1]丽水学院医学院基础部,323000

出　　处：《中华医学教育探索杂志》2012年第12期1243-1245,共3页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research

基　　金：浙江省新世纪教改项目（yb2010073）;丽水学院教改项目（2009-31-014）

摘　　要：目的对比较法在病理解剖学实验教学中的实践效果进行评价。方法将2009级口腔医学专科学生随机分为两组，每组48人。实验组采用病理解剖学与组织学比较的实验教学法，对照组沿用传统实验教学法。对两组的实验考试成绩进行对比，并对实验组学生开展问卷调查。结果实验组实验考试平均成绩为（88．38±5．68）分，对照组的实验考试平均成绩为（78．35±4．86）分。两组实验考试成绩比较，差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。问卷调查结果显示，实验组大部分学生赞同采用比较教学法。结论比较教学法是可行的，其实施过程强调温故而知新，加强了基础学科之间的联系，有利于提高病理学实验教学质量。Objective To evaluate the practical efficacy of comparison method in experimental teaching of pathological anatomy. Methods The junior college students of stomatology were divided into experimental group （n = 48） and control group （n = 48 ） randomly. Students in experimental group adopted the experimental teaching with comparison method of pathological anatomy and histology while those in control group followed the traditional experimental teaching. Experiment examination results of two grout were compared and questionnaire investigation was carried out among students in experimen- tal group~ Results Average score of experiment examination in experimental group was （88.35 ＋ 5.68） while that in control group was （78.35 ＋4.86）, with statistical differences （P 〈0.01 ）. The results of questionnaire investigation showed that students in experiment group preferred comparison teaching ,method. Conclusions Comparison teaching method is feasible, the mechanism of which em- phasizes gaining new knowledge by reviewing the old and strengthens the contact of basic subjects, therefore it is conducive to enhancing the quality of pathological experimental teaching.

关 键 词：病理解剖学 组织学 比较法 实验教学 

分 类 号：R322-4[医药卫生—人体解剖和组织胚胎学]