惩罚犯罪与保障人权的对立统一——强制证人出庭制度中情与法之博弈  

Punishment for Crimes and Safeguard for Human Rights——Game Between Kinship and Law in the Coercing Witness to Testify in Court

作　　者：刘立[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖北第二师范学院政治与法律系,武汉430205

出　　处：《湖北第二师范学院学报》2012年第10期37-40,共4页Journal of Hubei University of Education

摘　　要：新刑诉法首次将保障人权写进其总则,是继宪法的人权保障规定之后,我国部门法第一次对于人权保障的明文规定。保障人权原则只有在具体法律制度中得到贯彻,才有生命和活力。在刑诉法首次确立的"强制证人出庭作证制度"中,既增加了以惩罚犯罪为目的的强制措施,又补充了体现保障人权的"除外规定",让被告的亲人从证人席上走开。这就是惩罚犯罪与保障人权并重的具体制度设计。然而刑事诉讼,是各种利益实现、情与法博弈的一个场域,其制度的完善还需循序渐进,还需进一步统筹处理好强制证人出庭制度中的惩罚犯罪与保障人权对立统一的辩证关系。Safeguard for human rights is first written into the criminal procedure law and has expressly been prowcle^l m the department law of China for the fisrt time. The principle of safeguard for human rights is vivified only in the implement of specific legal system. For example, in the system of coercing witness to testify in court are added the coercive measures for the punishing crimes and the ＂exception rule＂ letting the defendant＇ s family go away from the witness-box. Such system is specifically designed to punish crimes and safeguard the human rights. However, the criminal litigation embodies various kinds of interests colliding, the kinship and law game field. The system still needs perfecting step by step to further resolve the dialectical relationship in the unity of opposites about punishing crimes and protecting human rights.

关 键 词：证人 出庭作证 特免权 亲亲相隐 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]