在定额化与个别化之间:死亡赔偿计算的再思考  

Quota Compensation or Individualized Compensation: Reflection on Death Compensation

作　　者：谢慧阳[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120

出　　处：《西南政法大学学报》2012年第6期82-90,共9页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目"死亡损害赔偿研究--‘同命同价’的价值与历史追问"(09YJA820010)

摘　　要：死亡赔偿的计算历来存在个别化与定额化之争,但无论在理论基础上还是实际效果上,上述两种主张都难言完美,存在各自难以克服的缺陷。之所以如此,在于学者们对于死亡赔偿的定位存在问题。事实上,死亡赔偿具有双重身份,不仅承载了死者家属补偿的需要,而且还承载了死者家属"报复"的需要。只有清楚地意识到死亡赔偿所承载的双重定位,明确它们的特点,才能设计出合理的死亡赔偿计算方式。无论是纯粹的个别化计算还是定额化计算都不可取,最终合理的路径应当是介于个别化与定额化之间的第三种计算方式。There are two ways of calculating death compensation, namely individualized compensation and quota compensation, and the dispute about the two ways has heat up. However, both of them are imperfect--in theory or in practice, there are inevitable defects in them. The reason is that scholars disagree with each other on the positioning of death compensation. In fact, death compensation functions in two ways ： to meet the needs of compensating the families of the victims and to satisfy their thoughts of revenge. Only when we understand its functions and features, can a proper calculating measure be designed. Absolute individualized compensation and quota compensation are both impractical. The best way shall be a combination of them.

关 键 词：死亡赔偿 个别化 定额化 补偿 报复 

分 类 号：DF526[政治法律—民商法学]