板式家具塑料封边条剥离方法的对比研究  

Comparison analysis of the peeling method for plastic edge band on panel furniture

作　　者：文超[1] 吴智慧[1] 张继雷[2] 

机构地区：[1]南京林业大学家具与工业设计学院,江苏省家具家饰产品设计工程技术研究中心,江苏南京210037 [2]密西西比州立大学,美国MS39762

出　　处：《南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）》2012年第6期151-153,共3页Journal of Nanjing Forestry University：Natural Sciences Edition

基　　金：工业和信息化部轻工行业标准制定项目(2010-2714T-QB);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)

摘　　要：分别采用家具表面软质、硬质覆面材料剥离方法测试了板式家具塑料封边条的剥离强度,并探讨了各方法可测试封边条的范围、剥离形式及破坏界面。结果表明,软质剥离方法适用于PVC和PP封边条以及2 mm厚的PMMA封边条,但不适用于ABS和1 mm厚的PMMA封边条,而硬质剥离方法仅适用于厚度大于0.8 mm的塑料封边条;软质剥离方法剥离后的封边条粘胶效果不好,剥离破坏主要发生在封边条和热熔胶之间;硬质方法剥离后封边条有粘胶效果,但不利于观察,剥离破坏主要发生在基材和热熔胶之间。The peel strength of plastic edge band on panel furniture was tested using the methods for peeling soft and hard overlaid materials,respectively,and the testable range of plastic edge band,the peeling form and interface destruction for different methods were also examined.The results showed that the soft peeling method was suitable for PVC and PP edge band,and the 2 mm PMMA edge band,but not suitable for ABS or 1 mm PMMA edge band,whereas the hard stripping method is only applicable to the plastic edge band of thickness greater than 0.8 mm.It was also found that the soft peeling method of edge band adversely affects the effectiveness of adhesives.The peeling destruction occurs mainly between the edge band and the hot melt adhesive.On the other hand,the hard peeling method leaves the resulting edge band with adhesive effect,however less observant,and the peeling destruction mainly observed in between the base material and the hot melt adhesive.

关 键 词：板式家具 塑料封边条 剥离方法 

分 类 号：TS664[轻工技术与工程]