检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广西师范大学体育学院公体部,广西桂林541004 [2]南宁市体育运动学校,广西南宁530021 [3]广西体操武术运动发展中心,广西南宁530031
出 处:《南京体育学院学报(社会科学版)》2012年第4期121-124,共4页Journal of Nanjing Institute of Physical Education
摘 要:采用文献资料法、录像观察法及统计比较法,系统分析中国技巧混双的优势与不足。结果表明:中国技巧混双的难度起评分与世界优秀选手相比,有微弱的优势。但成套动作的编排缺乏多样性和"亮点"且表演过于拘谨等因素,是中国混双未能取得优异成绩的主要原因。据此提出成套动作的编排不能只注重难度的数量,而应注重编排的艺术性、多样性和独创性。The article using the document literature method, video observation method and statistical comparison method, to analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the Chinese mixed doubles. The result shows that compared with the world excellent players, Chinese mixed doubles has slight superiority in the Difficulty starting score. So the main reasons why the Chinese mixed doubles failed to achieve good results due to the arrangement of the entire exer- cise lacking diversity and "lightspot" and even the showers are overcautious and so on. On the basis of above, the entire exercise could not focus on its difficulty, it is urgent to improve the artistry quality, diversity and originality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.219.135