《读书杂志》据缺注和赘注校勘述例  

On Reading Journal’s Textual Criticism according to False Notes and Redundant Notes

作　　者：张其昀[1] 

机构地区：[1]扬州大学文学院,江苏扬州225002

出　　处：《武陵学刊》2012年第6期117-123,共7页Journal of Wuling

基　　金：江苏省"十五""211工程"及重点高校建设项目"扬泰文库"二期子项目"人文传承与区域社会发展"(SQA0806A13)

摘　　要：王念孙堪称清乾嘉时期和整个校勘学历史上成就最大的一个代表性人物。他首先完全自觉地依据缺注和赘注现象进行典籍勘误,从而使之成为一个常规校勘手段。《读书杂志》集中体现了王念孙的校勘学成就。论列《读书杂志》中据缺注和赘注进行校勘之实例,将从一个侧面展示王念孙对于校勘学方法论之贡献。Wang Niansun is the most important representative of textual criticism in the period of Qianlong and Jiaqing. He corrects errors in the classic books according to false notes and redundant notes, which becomes later a regular way of textual criticism. Reading Journal is the best reflection of Wang Niansun＇s textual criticism achievement. This paper, with examples in Reading Journal, reveals Wang Niansun＇s contribution to methodology of textual criticism.

关 键 词：《读书杂志》 缺注 赘注 校勘手段 

分 类 号：H13[语言文字—汉语]