检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]伦敦大学学院(UCL)
出 处:《国际社会科学杂志(中文版)》2012年第4期12-22,5,共12页International Social Science Journal(Chinese Edition)
摘 要:许多人认为遗忘是数字媒体时代社会记忆的默认立场,是一种挑战社会领域可能性的破坏性力量。本文将探讨,当遗忘不是问题而是从新角度重铸未来的机会,当断裂而非延续成为衡量社会领域成功与否的立场时,将会发生什么。当今社会记忆领域迫在眉睫的议题,大概不是记忆的社会化能力,而是它与客观世界的关系。在客观世界中,客体除了淡化我们通过不受限的资源掘取向其施加的社会性力量之外,的确还另有所"为"。知识时代的社会记忆,需要在小族群的民族志研究资料与作为媒介的工业化和数字化产品间开展对话,以便预见我们还没有想象到的图景,或为其建立一个模型。Oblivion has been considered by many to be the default position of social memory in the age of digital media, a disruptive force that challenges the very possibility of social worlds. This article will explore what happens when oblivion is not a problem but an opportunity to recast the future in a new light, when not continuity but rupture is the position against which the success of social worlds is measured. At stake in the concerns over social memory today is arguably not the question of memory’s socialising capacity, but its relation to object worlds where objects do do something other than laundering the socialness of the forces that we project onto them, by extending access to resources beyond the confines of persons. Social memory in the age of know- ledge requires ethnographic data from small scale societies to be brought into conversation with the vehicular products of industrial and digital design in order for us to envision what we have not yet imagined or built a model for.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.205