不同护理人员人格特点及护理质量的对比研究  

Comparative study on personality characteristics and nursing quality of different nurses

作　　者：薛现霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东省滕州市中心人民医院,277500

出　　处：《国际护理学杂志》2012年第12期2203-2206,共4页international journal of nursing

摘　　要：目的总结分析不同护理人员在工作中存在的不安全因素，并提出防范对策。方法采用预试问卷编制即预试问卷采用匿名方式对初始胜任素质模式中各特征进行了适当的行为描述结构效度来检验问卷效度。将一般护理人员与专业护理人员两组数据分别进行分析，通过统计学分析来检验问卷项目是否能鉴别受试者的反应程度。结果两组护理人员16PF人格因素比较，专业护理人员在人格正面因素方面得分明显高于一般护理人员（P〈0．01），专业护理人员与一般护理人员在人格负面因素比较中差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）；在护理质量检查中，一般护理人员的满意度为0．625，而专业护理人员的满意度为0．886，两组比较差异具有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论专业护理人员个人素质胜于一般护理人员；专业护理人员护理质量高于一般护理人员；专业岗位需要专业护理人员；应通过培训使一般护理人员业务及性格素质向专业护理人员看齐。Objective To analyze the insecurity factors in nursing care for the different nurses and put forward preventing meas- ures. Methods The data of general nursing stuff and professional nursing staff were analyzed respectively, the subjects＇response were identi- fied. Results The scores of personality characteristics positive factors of professional nursing staff were higher than that of general nursing staff, and there was no difference in negative factors of personality characteristics （P 〉 0. 05 ）. In the examination of nursing quality, satis- faction degree for general nursing staff was 0. 625, and 0. 886 for professional nursing staff. There was significant difference （ P 〈 0. 05 ）. Conclusions Personal quality and nursing quality of professional nursing staff were superior to those of general nursing stuff. General nurs- ing staff should be trained for business and personal quality to become professional staff.

关 键 词：护理安全 护士 护理质量 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学] C931[医药卫生—临床医学]