泪囊鼻腔吻合术两种手术方式的比较  

The evaluation of two different methods of dacryocystorhinostomy

作　　者：王夏[1] 孙桂丽[1] 

机构地区：[1]濮阳市人民医院眼科,河南濮阳457000

出　　处：《中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志》2012年第12期943-945,共3页Chinese Journal of Ocular Trauma and Occupational Eye Disease

摘　　要：目的比较传统经皮泪囊鼻腔吻合术与鼻内窥镜下鼻内泪囊鼻腔吻合术二者的临床效果。方法慢性泪囊炎23例（25眼）随机分为两组，A组11例12眼，行传统经皮泪囊鼻腔吻合术；B组12例13眼行鼻内窥镜下鼻内泪囊鼻腔吻合术。结果A组治愈11眼（91．67％）。B组治愈13眼（100％）。结论鼻内窥镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合术是较好的方法。Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of two diffirent kinds of surgery： traditional dacryocystorhinostomy through skin cut and dacryocystorhinostomy by endoscope. Methods 23 patients with chronic dacryoeystitis were randomly divided into two groups. The group A contains 12 eyes of 11 pa- tients who accept traditional dacryocystorhinostomy and group B contains 13 eyes of 12 patients who accept dacryocystorhinostomy by endoscope. Results There were 11 eyes cured（91.67% ） in group A, and 13 eyes cured（ 100% ） in group B. Conclusion It is obvious that dacryocystorhinostomy by endoscope is a better method.

关 键 词：泪囊鼻腔吻合术 术式 

分 类 号：R779.6[医药卫生—眼科]