检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京大学商学院,南京210093
出 处:《南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学)》2012年第6期144-153,157,共10页Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家自然科学基金(70972031;71272110);教育部人文社会科学研究基金(08JC630042);南京大学人文社会科学研究基金
摘 要:为什么巨型企业会失败?以往文献虽然对竞争能力惰性进行定义并围绕文化、组织结构、企业高管行为展开了分析,但仅仅是偏重于某一个部分,而且并没有对竞争能力惰性如何影响企业衰败的过程进行研究,而这需要基于微观机制视角来进行研究。组织的理性是有限的,在企业竞争能力发生衰败的过程中,企业竞争能力的自我强化机制加速了企业衰败的进程。竞争能力的三个载体——高管人员认知、组织结构、组织文化呈现出惰性特征,会导致企业高管人员的感觉失灵、决策态度失灵、纠正偏差措施失灵和沟通环节的失灵,最终导致企业衰败。这一研究丰富了对动态竞争理论、组织衰败和学习理论的研究。What accounts for the decline of a corporate magnate? The available literature of research is found to be very restrictive with only such definitions as competition inertia,and such study interest as organization culture,structure and top management behavior,with the focus paid only to one aspect,ignoring the process in which competition inertia leads to a fail of an organization.We should have a close examination of the problem from an angle of its micro-mechanism.Rationalities of an organization are not always so dominant that an organization's self-motivation to competition works instead.Top management's understanding,organization structure and organization culture,where competitiveness is found,may leave numb the top management's perception,its decision making,error correction,and communication,and end up with business declining.This study helps expand the research on theories of competition dynamics,business declining and corporate learning.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15