沟通式规划理论的简介,批判与借鉴  

Communicative Planning Theory: Introduction, Criticism and Inspiration

作　　者：王丰龙[1] 陈倩敏[2] 许艳艳 刘云刚[4] 

机构地区：[1]香港浸会大学地理系 [2]广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院 [3]佛山市禅城区张槎国土城建和水务局 [4]中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广东省城市化与地理环境空间模拟重点实验室

出　　处：《国际城市规划》2012年第6期82-90,共9页Urban Planning International

基　　金：香港研究资助局优配研究金(GRF)资助项目(编号:HKBU245008;HKBU244610);国家自然科学基金项目(40701041);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金(12YJAGJW007)

摘　　要：本文在回顾近百年来西方城市规划理论演变的基础上,将西方城市规划理论划分为经验理性、工具理性、价值理性和沟通理性四个范式,并着重对目前西方主流的沟通式规划理论进行了简要介绍和批判性总结。本文认为,一方面,沟通式规划存在着假设前提的脆弱性、实施过程的矛盾性和实践结果的松散性三大重要缺陷,其自身的这种局限性不容忽视;另一方面,沟通式规划理论作为西方规划百年来发展的一种新形式,也有很多值得中国城市规划借鉴的地方。作者即以中国规划界研究的热门领域(也是沟通式规划经常被应用的领域)——战略规划为例,探讨了如何借鉴西方沟通式规划的理论思想和实践经验。Based on a review of western planning theories in the recent century, this paper divides the western history of planning thoughts into four sequential paradigms： the ＇empirical rationality paradigm＇ , ＇instrumental rationality paradigm＇ , ＇value rationality paradigm＇ and ＇communicative rationality paradigm＇ . Through a brief summarization and critical reading of the communicative planning theories, we argue that there are three major flaws of it, i.e. the frangibility of its premise, the conflicting tendencies of its implementation process, and the problematic justice of a loose end. Besides the limits of current communicative planning theory, there are still a lot to learn for the Chinese planners from this latest planning form. Taking the prevailing ＇ strategic planning＇ in China （also a field which is intensively referred in the communicative planning theory） as an example, we briefly discuss the thoughts and experience which are worth lcaming by China＇ s contemporary planning system from the communicative planning.

关 键 词：范式 沟通式规划 批判 战略规划 借鉴 

分 类 号：TU981[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]