戊二醛酚醛树脂用于牙髓塑化治疗的临床研究  

Clinical evaluation of glutadehyde resinifying therapy on pulp diseases

作　　者：高德[1] 刘传奇[1] 李宣 马艺[1] 张月云[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东济宁口腔医院口腔内科,272145

出　　处：《中华口腔医学杂志》2000年第3期209-211,共3页Chinese Journal of Stomatology

摘　　要：目的　评价戊二醛酚醛树脂 (glutadehyderesinifyingtherapy ,GR)塑化剂临床应用的可行性 ,为临床推广提供依据。方法　将GR和甲醛酚醛树脂 (formaldehyderesinifyingtherapy ,FR)作对照组应用于牙髓塑化治疗 ,共治疗 2 70颗患牙 ,观察术后反应对比情况及近期 (0 5～ 1年 )和远期 (2～ 4年 )疗效的对比。结果　GR组术后疼痛发生率为 10 2 % ,FR组为 19 8% ,经 χ2 检验差异有显著性 (P <0 0 5 ) ;GR组和FR组近期疗效分别为 85 4%和 84 9% ,远期疗效分别为 92 0 %和 90 8% ,近、远期疗效对比 ,经 χ2 检验差异均无显著性 (P >0 0 5 )。结论　GR用于牙髓塑化治疗与FR同样取得了较好疗效 ;GR术后疼痛发生率低 。Objective To evaluate clinically the glutadehyde resinifying therapy(GR) on pulp diseases Methods A total of 270 teeth with pulp diseases were divided into GR and formaldehyde resinifying therapy(FR) groups The latter served as a control Immediate post operation reactions, short term (0 5～1 year)and long term(2～4 years) results were compared between the two groups Results Ratio of post operation pain for GR group was 10 2%, while 19 8% for FR group The difference was statistically significant ( P <0 05,by χ 2 test) The short term successful rates were 85 4% and 84 9% for GR and FR groups, respectively, whilst the long term rates were 92 0% and 90 8%, respectively, there were no significant differences between the two groups statistically Conclusions GR could obtain similar clinical results as FR, and has an advantage of lower rate of post operation pain compared with FR

关 键 词：牙髓塑化治疗 戊二醛酚醛树脂 塑化剂 

分 类 号：R783.2[医药卫生—口腔医学]