基金资助论文与无基金资助论文被引情况分析:以部分高水平医学期刊为例  

Analysis of differences in citation between funded papers and non-funded papers in some high-level medical journals

作　　者：赵静[1] 接雅俐[2] 杜志波[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省老年医学研究所<实用老年医学>编辑部,江苏南京210024 [2]南京医科大学学报编辑部,江苏南京210029

出　　处：《南京医科大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第6期499-501,共3页Journal of Nanjing Medical University（Social Sciences）

基　　金：江苏省科技期刊研究基金项目(JKQJXB023;JKQJXB001)

摘　　要：选择基金资助论文作为高水平论文,对其被引用情况进行分析,同时与无基金资助论文的被引情况进行比较,以探讨二者被引情况存在的差异。结果表明,被引用过的基金资助论文的单篇被引频次并不比无基金资助论文高,而基金资助论文的被引率显著高于无基金资助论文。由此可见,论文的引用率可推广应用于表示期刊的水平。This article chose funded papers as high-level papers, analyzed the citations of these papers, and investigated the differences in citation between funded papers and non-funded papers. The results suggested that there was no difference in citation frequency of single paper between funded papers and non-funded papers, while there was significant difference in citation rate between funded papers and non-funded papers. It could be got that citation rate of papers may be used to reflect the levels of journals.

关 键 词：基金资助 被引频次 被引率 

分 类 号：R-058[医药卫生]