单项罪名中排除非法证据的困境与出路--以“蟹妈案”和程镇捷案为视角  

The Predicament and Way outof Exclusion of Illegal Evidence in Single Criminal Charge——From the Perspective of "Mei Xiaoyang" Case and "Cheng Zhenjie" Case

作　　者：奚玮[1,2] 朱敏敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学政法学院 [2]北京师范大学

出　　处：《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2012年第5期85-89,共5页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

摘　　要：在"两个证据规定"的适用中,排除非法证据的案件主要反映在共同犯罪、数个罪名的情况,而且不影响最终的定罪处理。在单项罪名下,因排除非法证据而导致无罪判决的案例极少。在社会各界高度关注的"蟹妈案"与程镇捷案中,是否在单项罪名中排除非法证据成为争议焦点。在《刑事诉讼法修正案》即将实施之际,依据程序正义,贯彻无罪推定理念和疑罪从无原则是解决单项罪名中排除非法证据问题的有效出路,也是实现刑事司法利益平衡的优化选择。In the application of ＂Two Provisions relating to Evidence＂,the provision of exclusion of illegal evidence is mainly applied in the joint crime involved in a number of charges,which will not affect the final conviction.In the judgment of a single criminal charge,seldom cases are judged acquittal due to the exclusion of illegal evidence.In ＂Mei Xiaoyang＂ case and ＂Cheng Zhenjie＂ case which are highly concerned by society,it became a hot topic whether to exclude illegally obtained evidence in the judgment of a single criminal charge or not.Based on procedural justice,it is an effective way to solve the problem of exclusion of illegal evidence in a single charge by carrying out the idea of presumption of innocence and the principle of non-existence of doubted guilt,which also an optimal choice to achieve the balance of the interests of the criminal justice.

关 键 词：单项罪名 非法证据 蟹妈案 程序正义 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]