当代法律解释学的困境——反思诠释学及哲学对法律解释学的侵入  

Dilemmas of Present Legal Hermeneutics: a Reflection to Hermeneutics & Philosophy Invading Legal Hermeneutics

作　　者：李可[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,南京211189

出　　处：《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》2012年第12期37-42,共6页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）

基　　金：江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究指导项目"法学方法论之本真"(2010SJD820014);2011年度国家社会科学基金项目一般项目"当代中国立法与习惯法研究"(11BFX002)资助

摘　　要：稍经检讨即可发现,当代法律解释学已经陷入客观性破灭、解释的歧义与泛化、元规则的缺位、独白式理解等种种困境。分析表明,哲学诠释学的强势进入要为此担负主要责任,而当代法律解释学对一般哲学的过分依赖则是其自陷困局的重要原因。当代法律解释学所面临的上述困境是依靠其自身力量在短期内无法加以摆脱的,因而,发起一场悄悄的"去哲学化"运动,是当代法律解释学走出困境的必由之举。We can discover by a little review that present legal hermeneutics has fallen into such dilemmas as the burst of objectivity, the ambiguity and generalization of interpretation, the absence of meta-rule, the monologue understanding. The analyses show that the mighty entrance of philosophical hermeneutics should be primary responsibility for it, and the fact that legal hermeneutic has been relying on the general philosophy too much is the important reason why it has fallen into the dilemmas. The dilemmas of present legal hermeneutics can＇ t be gotten rid of by its own strength in the short term, thus, it is imperative to launch a quiet campaign of ＂getting rid of philosophy＂ for present legal hermen^utlt~.q if it i.~ tn walk ~,t nf the rlilt^rnrnA~

关 键 词：法律解释学 哲学诠释学 一般哲学 去哲学化 

分 类 号：D901[政治法律—法学理论]