检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨丰云[1] 付廷明[1] 郭立玮[1] 刘峰 张伟
机构地区:[1]南京中医药大学中药复方分离工程重点实验室,南京210029 [2]陕西步长制药有限公司,西安710075
出 处:《世界科学技术-中医药现代化》2012年第6期2244-2247,共4页Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Materia Medica-World Science and Technology
基 金:科学技术部国家"重大新药创制"科技重大专项(2011ZX09401-308-008):药物新剂型与新技术研究;负责人:杨丰云
摘 要:目的:对地龙湿法超微粉碎与常规匀浆两种提取工艺的提取效率进行比较。方法:采用粒径分析、扫描电镜、Bradford法测定蛋白含量等手段,建立"时间-粒径分布"与"时间-蛋白质累积溶出百分率"曲线,比较地龙粉碎与蛋白溶出的动力学过程。并采用HPLC指纹图谱技术,比较两种提取产物的成分差异。结果:地龙湿法超微粉碎与常规匀浆两种处理工艺所得成分的指纹图谱峰形基本一致,但前者所得色谱峰面积明显高于后者,表明前者提取效率明显高于后者。结论:湿法超微粉碎提取技术适用于地龙成分提取,整个工艺过程快速简捷,适于工业化推广。This study was aimed to make a preliminary comparison of earthworm extraction efficiency using con- ventional homogenized and wet ultrafine grinding process, respectively. The curve of "time-particle size distribution" and "time-protein accumulation dissolution rate" was established through particle size analysis, scanning electron-microscopy and protein determination with Bradford method to make a comparison of earthworm smash- dissolution dynamics. And a comparison of extract composition with HPLC fingerprint was made. The results shows that the peak shapes of extracts from both processes were basically the same. While the composition peak area extracted with wet ultrafine grinding process were significantly higher than conventional homogenized process. It indicates that earthworm extracted efficiency using wet ultra.fine grinding process were obviously higher than conventional homogenized process. Wet ultrafine grinding can be used to extract earthworm compositions. The whole process is quick, simple and suitable for large-scale promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7