检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]电子科技大学电子工程学院 [2]中国人民解放军63801部队
出 处:《现代电子技术》2013年第1期1-4,共4页Modern Electronics Technique
基 金:国家自然科学基金支持(61101171)
摘 要:为明确二维干涉仪测向中传统体制和相关体制两类算法的不同适用范围,一方面将扩展基线干涉仪算法从一维测向拓展到方位俯仰角二维测向;另一方面采用插值拟合技术提高空间夹角相关干涉仪算法测向精度。通过Matlab对两种算法的测向精度和抗系统误差性能进行仿真对比实验,明确了各算法的优势,为干涉仪测向设备中测向技术的选择提供依据。The paper makes a comparative study of the traditional interferometer direction finding algorithm and the correla-tion interferometer direction finding algorithm used in two-dimensional inteferometer direction finding to determine the applica-tion scope of each algorithm. On the one hand, the baseline interferometer algorithm is extended from one-dimensional direction finding to two-dimensional direction finding, including the measurement of azimuth and pitch angle. On the other hand, three- point interpolation is used on space angle algorithm to improve the measurement accuracy. The paper raakes a comparision of the performance of these two algorithms in terms of direction finding precision and ability of each algorithm to resist systematic er-rors with Matlab simulation, followed by the description of advantages of each algorithm, which provides a basis for the selec-tion of the direction finding technologies used in interferometer direction finding devices.
关 键 词:干涉仪 空间夹角 扩展基线 测向精度 抗系统误差
分 类 号:TN966-34[电子电信—信号与信息处理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229