经济学科学是应用数学的一个分支吗?——A.罗森伯格经济学哲学思想解读(续)  

Should We Treat Economic Theory as a Part of Applied Mathematics? Research on A.Rosenberg's Philosophy of Economics

作　　者：陈群[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学马克思主义理论教研部,400044

出　　处：《经济评论》2013年第1期5-10,共6页Economic Review

基　　金：重庆大学中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目"科学哲学视野下的当代经济学方法论前沿问题研究"(项目编号:CQDXWL-2012-060)的资助

摘　　要：A.罗森伯格从认识论层面分析了经济学学科的认知地位。微观经济学对致极理论和意向性研究纲领的一贯坚持表明经济学根本就不是经验科学,经济学理论的演绎特征跟欧氏几何学在科学史上的认知地位具有明显的相似之处,差异在于欧氏几何有现代物理学作为其修正与改进的参照系,而经济学理论则没有,即使是当今认知科学前沿理论也无法提供。他认为经济学是应用数学的一个分支,处于纯粹的公理系统与应用的公理系统相交的地方。温特劳布则从数学哲学和语境论视角分析经济学数学化的演变进程,从文化、制度和历史变迁中考察数学观念的变迁和对经济学数学化演变进程的影响。A. Rosenberg analyses the cognitive status of the economics discipline from the epistemological level. The consistent adherence of Microeconomics to the Extremal Strategy Theory and intentional explanation program has shown that economics is not an empirical science and the deduction features of economic theory has obvious similarity with Euclidean geometry about the cognitive status in the history and their difference lies in that Euclidean geometry has improved and advanced reference theory of the modern physics, but economics does not have its reference theory, even the modern cognitive science frontier theory cannot provide it. He believes that economics is a branch of applied mathematics and is intersected between pure axiom system and applied axiom system. E. Roy Weintraub analyses the evolution process of mathematizing of economics from the perspective of mathematics philosophy and contextualism, and studies the changes of mathematical views and influences on evolution process of economics mathematizing from the cultural, institutional and historical views.

关 键 词：致极理论 意向性解释 欧氏几何 经济学数学化 

分 类 号：F091.3[经济管理—政治经济学]