再论推导作为诉讼证明的逻辑  

Reflection on Abduction as the Logic of Legal Proof

作　　者：胡学军[1] 

机构地区：[1]南昌大学法学院,江西南昌330031

出　　处：《河北法学》2013年第1期2-10,共9页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：江西高校重点学科发展基金;江西省"十二五"社会科学规划课题<司法改革背景下的民事证据制度研究>(11FX06);2012年度江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目<具体举证责任研究>(FX1220)阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：推导作为演绎和归纳之外的一种可废止和情境化的第三种类型的非形式逻辑推理是由美国实用主义哲学家皮尔斯提出的所谓"科学发现的逻辑"。其与传统演绎、归纳等形式逻辑的最本质区别在于推导是认识新事物、产生新知识的"逻辑"方法。皮尔斯之后的研究者着力于将"背景知识"的作用引入推导推理,从而促进了推导推理形式的发展完善,这一发展,也使其作为诉讼证明的逻辑更具说服力,更契合诉讼证明与事实认定的实践运行状态。在法学中引入推导推理这一认识逻辑的新范式将引起我们在法律事实、证据、证明及诉讼等领域的一系列重要观念转换。Abduction as the third type of reasoning beyond the deductive and inductive is one kind of defeasible and the contextual non-formal logical,it is proposed as the ＂Logic of Scientific Discovery＂ by the founder of American pragmatism Charles Sanders Peirce.With other forms of traditional deductive and inductive logic,the most essential difference is： Abduction is the ＂logical＂ approach to understanding new things,to produce new knowledge.The researchers after Pierce focused on introducing the role of background knowledge into the Abduction,thus contributing to the development and improvement of Abduction in the form of this development,but also make it more convincing proof of logic as a litigation,more fit the actual operation of the lawsuit proof and fact finding.This new paradigm of abduction as epistemology of logic be introduced in law will cause we a series of important concepts-conversion in the field of legal facts,evidence,proof and litigation.

关 键 词：推导推理 认识逻辑 诉讼证明 观念转换 

分 类 号：DF71[政治法律—诉讼法学]