检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]滕州市中心人民医院肿瘤科,山东滕州277500
出 处:《中华肿瘤防治杂志》2012年第24期1848-1851,共4页Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
摘 要:目的:评价吸烟与脑胶质瘤发生危险的关系。方法:检索1985-01-2012-10公开发表在Medline、EMBASE、Ovid和CNKI关于吸烟与脑胶质瘤发生关系的队列研究和病例对照研究。应用STATA 11.0统计软件分析吸烟与脑胶质瘤间的关联,计算合并优势比OR及95%可信区间(95%CI)。结果:最终共有12项研究纳入分析,其中队列研究4项,病例对照研究8项。Meta分析结果显示,各研究间不存在统计学异质性,I2=10.5,P=0.35。因此,合并分析采用固定效应模型。脑胶质瘤组与对照组人群中吸烟人数的优势比差异无统计学意义,OR=1.03,95%CI:0.95~1.11,P=0.53。亚组分析显示,分别以研究类型(队列研究/病例对照研究)、对照人群来源和研究种族为亚组进行分析,吸烟与脑胶质瘤发生无关,P>0.05。结论:吸烟与脑胶质瘤无明显相关性,烟草消费可能不是脑胶质瘤发生的危险因素。OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between smoking and glioma risk. METHODS: By searching Medline, EMBSE,Ovid and CNKI databases, the open published studies about the association between smoking and glioma risk from 1985-01 to 2012-10 were reviewed. The pooled odds ratio(OR) and 95% confidence interval of smokers in glio- ma patients compared to normal controls were aggregated by statistic software Statal 1.0. RESULTS:Twelve articles,with 8 case-control and 4 cohort studies,were included in this Meta-analysis. The heterogeneity test demonstrate that no statis- tical heterogeneity across studies was found(I2 = 10.5, P= 0.35). The aggregated results showed there was no difference of the prevalence of smokers in glioma patients and normal controls (OR= 1.03,95 % CI: 0.95- 1. 11, P = 0. 53). Sub- group analysis showed that no significant association between glioma and smoking in the subgroup analysis of study type, control type and different race (P〉0.05). CONCLUSION: No close association between smoking and glioma risk is found in this Meta-analysis,whicb indicates smoking may not contribute to the incidence of glioma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229