检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]甘肃农业大学资源与环境学院,兰州730070 [2]中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态重点实验室,北京100085 [3]美国Smithsonian环境研究中心,美国马里兰州21037
出 处:《生态学报》2013年第1期188-194,共7页Acta Ecologica Sinica
基 金:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项课题(2012ZX07209002,2012ZX07203003)
摘 要:对北美切斯比克海湾99个河口海岸带地理特征(流域土地利用类型、河口宽度、海岸线分形维度、流域面积与河口面积比、高分辨率平均波浪高度和沉积物等)对1984—2009年间沉水植被丰度的影响进行了研究。结果表明:相同盐度分区的不同土地利用类型下,以及相同土地利用类型的不同盐度分区下,沉水植被丰度存在着明显的差异;沉水植被丰度与海岸带地理特征各单因子之间呈微弱相关性(-0.157≤r≤0.442),其中,沉水植被丰度与河口宽度(r=0.442,P<0.001)、分形维度(r=0.290,P=0.007)和平均波浪高度(r=0.306,P=0.002)相关关系相对较高,且呈极显著正相关(P<0.01);分类回归树模型分析表明,影响沉水植被丰度的海岸带地理特征因子依次为流域与河口面比、河口分形维度、盐度和平均波浪高度,共可解释沉水植被丰度空间变异的60%以上。研究表明,海岸带地理特征直接或间接的影响着区域沉水植被丰度,二者之间存在一定的相关关系;不同特征因子对沉水植被丰度的影响程度不同,但整体呈现出多因素综合的复杂影响。研究结果对切斯比克海湾沉水植被的生态恢复具有一定的指导意义。Submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV)consists of a taxonomically diverse group of plants that lives entirely beneath the water surface. SAV provides habitat and supplies food for aquatic life, absorbs excess nutrients, and helps purify the water. Since the 1960s, SAV coverage has experienced dramatic decline worldwide due to serious deterioration of water quality in coastal ecosystems. In recent years, landscape analyses have been used to predict direct or indirect effects of geographic characteristics on aquatic organisms. In this study, we analyzed the effects of coastal geographical characteristics ( such as watershed land use types, sub-estuary mouth width, shoreline fractal dimension, ratio of watershed area/sub-estuary area, high resolution average wave height and estuary sediment, etc. ) on the spatial variation of SAV abundance based on the long-term dataset (1984--2009) from 99 sub-estuaries and their linked coastal sub-watersheds of the Chesapeake Bay in the United States. Coastal watershed land use is an important factor influencing inputs of nutrient and sediment to its associated sub-estuary,and thus indirectly affects SAV abundance. Our resuhs showed that sub-estuaries with different dominant land covers in each salinity regime had significantly different variation in SAV abundance. Abundance of different SAV species varies spatially among different salinity regimes in shallow water area. In each salinity regime, SAV abundance in sub-estuaries declined with their linked coastal dominant watershed land use type in the following order: mixed-land 〉 developed land or forested land 〉 agricultural land in fresh water (TF) regime; mixed-land or agricultural land 〉 developed land 〉 forested land in oligohaline (OH) regime; forested land or mixed-land 〉 developed land or agricultural land in mesohaline (MH) regime ; mixed-land or forested land 〉 developed land 〉 agricultural land in polyhaline (PH) regime. Sub-estuaries with different salinity regimes for each domin
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31