检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《上海护理》2013年第1期22-25,共4页Shanghai Nursing
基 金:2010年度医学教育研究立项课题(编号:2010-09-05);2011年度上海市教育科学研究市级项目(编号:B11032)
摘 要:目的探讨以问题为基础的学习法(problem-based learning,PBL)对护理本科生评判性思维能力的影响及相关因素分析。方法上海交通大学护理学院选择2008届4年制护理本科生82名,在PBL课程前后,采用中文版评判性思维能力测量表(CTDI-CV)和自行设计的PBL课程学习积极程度问卷进行测量。结果 PBL教学后,护理本科生的分析能力、评判性思维的自信心得到提高(P<0.05)。PBL教学中,学生不同的案例准备时间在求知欲特质上存在差异(P<0.05);不同的课上发言次数在寻找真相特质上存在差异(P<0.05)。结论教师在PBL教学中需要激发护理本科生的积极性,鼓励其在课前对案例做好充分预习,在课程中积极发表自己的观点,提高他们的评判性思维能力。Objective To investigate the influence of problem-based learning (PBL) on the critical thinking skills of nursing undergraduates, and to analyze the related factors. Methods A total of 82 nursing undergrad- uates in our school were selected. Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version (CTDI-CV) and self- designed questionnaire on nursing undergraduate enthusiasm for participation in PBL were used. Results The analytical skills and critical thinking self - confidence of nursing undergraduates were significantly improved ( P 〈 0.05 ). There were significant differences in the scores of inquisitiveness among nursing undergraduates with different time being spent on preparing cases (P 〈 0.05 ). And there were significant differences in the scores of truth-seeking among nursing undergraduates with different expressing frequencies in class ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclu- sion The teachers should encourage nursing undergraduates to fully prepare cases and express themselves freely in discussion in PBL so as to improve their critical thinking skills.
关 键 词:护理本科生 以问题为基础的学习法 评判性思维
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3