检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李长城[1]
出 处:《湖南警察学院学报》2012年第5期27-31,共5页Journal of Hunan Police Academy
基 金:国家社会科学基金:中国地方性刑事司法规则研究(11BFX124)
摘 要:新刑诉法强化了犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的律师帮助权,改革了卷宗制度,改进了证人和鉴定人的出庭制度,强化了犯罪嫌疑人、被告人对刑事程序进程的参与,有助于防范刑事程序的滥用。但是新刑诉法缺乏应对基层司法地方化的措施,法律援助制度不能充分满足司法实践的需要,被告方的质证权还需要进一步的保障,因此难以充分防范刑事程序的滥用。应当在四个主要的方面进行相应完善,以便进一步加强刑事辩护,有效防范刑事程序的滥用。The new Criminal Procedure Law strengthened the right of lawyer's assistance to the suspect and the defendant,reformed the file system,improved the court system of the witnesses and experts,strengthened the participation of the suspects and the accused in criminal procedure,which is very helpful in guarding against the abuse of the criminal procedure.However,in the new Criminal Procedure Law,there is still no measures to deal with the localization of grassroots judicature,the legal aid system can not fully meet the needs of the judicial practice,and the cross-examination right of the defendant needs further protection,it is very difficult to fully guard against the abuse of the criminal procedure.In order to further strengthen the criminal defense and effectively prevent the abuse of criminal procedure,corresponding improvement should be carried out in four main aspects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145