论建国初期的乡村干群关系——以淮河流域商水县为例(1949—1954)  

On the Relationship between Rural Cadres and the Masses in the Early Period of the People's Republic of China——Case Studies in Shangshui County, Henan Province(1949-1954)

作　　者：贾滕[1] 

机构地区：[1]周口师范学院中原传统农区文化传承与发展研究中心,河南周口466001

出　　处：《安徽史学》2013年第1期78-84,128,共8页Historical Research In Anhui

基　　金：2009年度国家社会科学基金项目<土改背景下的乡村秩序重构与灾害应对研究--以淮河流域商水县为中心的考察(1947-1954)>(09CZS024);2011年度河南省高等学校青年骨干教师资助计划项目<革命背景下国家与乡村社会关系研究>(2011GGJS-164)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：建国初期,党—国家通过以土地改革为中心的一系列乡村社会革命运动为载体,实现了政权下乡与党团下乡;通过培训及在历次群众运动或完成上级任务的过程中、从大量涌现出来的积极分子中选拔以贫雇农为主的乡村干部的方式,解决干部的来源问题;进而,通过乡村干部对群众运动进行领导与推动——但在此过程中不免产生干群矛盾。对于乡村干群矛盾的化解,党—国家往往在推动乡村革命的进程中,通过发动群众、整顿组织,进而整顿干部,甚至以群众意愿决定干部去留的方式解决。这种方式显示了建国初期乡村干部与群众关系的时代特点:干群关系受革命伦理及动员—运动机制的制约。当然,这一时期乡村干群关系的特点正是国家建构目标与乡村现实矛盾的折射。In the early period of the People＇ s Republic of China, by means of a series of rural social revolutionary move- ments centering on land reform, the Party and the State subsequently took rural areas under the control. Cadres in rural areas were trained and selected from the activists poured out in mass movements, or in the process of completing tasks assigned by the upper hierarchies, which solved the source of the rural cadres. Therefore the new mass movements were led and promoted by the rural cadres. However, the contradictions between the cadres and the masses unavoidably appeared. The Party and the State usually solved them by motivating the masses, rectifying the organizations, disciplining the cadres or even dismissing them at the wish of the masses. This shows the characteristics of the relationship between rural cadres and the masses in the early period of PRC： the relationship between them was restricted by revolutionary ethics and mobilization - motion mecha- nism, which indeed reflected the contradictions between the State＇s construction targets and the realities in rural areas.

关 键 词：建国初期 乡村干群关系 时代特点 商水县 

分 类 号：K27[历史地理—历史学]