检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋娜[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875
出 处:《现代法学》2013年第1期153-162,共10页Modern Law Science
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目"国际刑事法治的发展趋势及对我国和平发展的影响研究"(11CFX066)
摘 要:在国际刑事诉讼中,检察官起诉裁量权的外部控制不可或缺,而单纯的外部控制却凸显范围有限、效果不佳、成本高昂等局限与不足。与单纯的外部控制相比,内部控制具有主动性、自律性的特点,且这种内部监督和控制的限度还与国际刑事法治的境界相契合。在当前检察官的起诉裁量权广泛存在且业已渗入非缔约国司法领域的情况下,只有将基于内外因辩证关系原理指导下的双重控制有机结合起来,才能防范裁量权滥用,促进实现裁量正义,保证国际刑事诉讼中检察官裁量权的公正行使。In international criminal proceedings, even though external control over prosecutorial discretion is held indispensable, mere external control has betrayed not a few defects, such as limited coverage, low efficiency or high costs. Compared with pure external control, internal control, featured with initiative and self- discipline, is well consistent with practices of international criminal justice in terms of its bounds of supervision and control. Since prosecutorial discretion is now ubiquitous and has even been introduced into jurisdictions of non-parties to the Rome Statute, only by way of combining external and internal controls under dialectical principle, can we prevent the abuse of prosecutorial discretion and realize discretionary justice in international criminal proceedings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.242.110