检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄礼德[1] 郭立强[1] 颜祖弟[1] 文全泰[1] 潘廷啟[1] 吕坤[1] 黄锁义[1]
机构地区:[1]右江民族医学院,百色533000
出 处:《国际生物医学工程杂志》2012年第6期353-356,共4页International Journal of Biomedical Engineering
基 金:2013年度自治区级大学生创新训练计划立项资助项目(QJCX201338)
摘 要:目的比较研究土人参多糖的酶法提取、超声辅助提取及2种方法联合提取的优劣。方法采用正交试验优化土人参多糖的酶法提取及超声提取方案,并研究2种方案的结合效果。结果3种提取工艺中,酶法提取多糖得率平均为17.45%,超声提取多糖得率平均为20.01%,酶-超声联合提取多糖得率平均为20.74%。结论酶-超声联合提取土人参多糖效果省时且高效。Objective To comparatively study the advantage and disadvantage of different polysaecharide extraction methods of enzymatic extraction, ultrasonic extraction and a combination of these two processes. Methods The enzymatic extraction and ultrasonic extraction were first optimized by orthogonal design and then compared with the effect of combination. Results From the results of three extraction techniques, enzymatic extraction of Talinum crassifolium polysaccharide's average extraction rate was 17.45%, ultrasonic extraction was 20.01%, enzyme-ultrasonic extraction was 20.74%. Conclusion The combined optimum preparative procedure of Talinum crassifolium is simple, quickly and high efficient.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3