检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]衡阳市第一人民医院口腔科,湖南衡阳421002 [2]衡阳市妇幼保健院口腔科 [3]南华大学附属第二医院口腔科
出 处:《中南医学科学杂志》2013年第1期24-27,共4页Medical Science Journal of Central South China
摘 要:目的探讨上颌功能性印模与解剖式印模在各区域的变化。方法对同一个研究对象分别制取解剖式印模和功能性印模,测定两个模型相应点与基准点的深度变化。结果经统计学处理发现两种模型在两侧对称区域的变化差异无显著性(P>0.05),而牙区与很多区域之间差异有显著性(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论功能性印模与解剖式印模的差别在各个区域之间变化不一致。Objective To discuss the variation between maxillary functional impression and anatomical impression in every region. Methods To make the anatomical impression and functional impression from every patients, and deter- mine the depth changes of reference point and corresponding point in these models. Results Statistical analysis showed that the ehanges of the bilaterally symmetrical area between the two models had no significant difference( P 〉 0.05 ) , but the changes of the tooth area and many other areas had significant difference ( P 〈 0.05, P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Tile changes between the anatomical impression and functional impression were not different in every region.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4