检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖南师范大学资源与环境科学学院,长沙410081
出 处:《生态学报》2013年第2期595-602,共8页Acta Ecologica Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(40871043;41140004);湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(12JJ6034);湖南师范大学人文地理学校级重点学科项目
摘 要:基于长株潭地区被批准为"全国资源节约型和环境友好型社会建设综合配套改革试验区"的背景,针对生态足迹方法的产量因子参数进行改进,利用区域产量因子代替全球产量因子,对长株潭地区1986—2005年生态足迹和生态承载力进行核算,在此基础上,着重采用两种预测方法对该地区2007—2015年生态足迹和生态容量进行预测。两种预测方法分别是二项式曲线预测模型和灰色GM(1,1)模型,对长株潭地区1986—2005年20a的人均生态足迹与时间关系进行了拟合,得出二项式曲线预测模型具有更高的预测精度;用两种预测模型预测了长株潭地区的人均生态容量,GM(1,1)模型的预测精度更高。选取精度最高的模型分别预测研究区未来10a人均生态足迹和生态容量。未来10a人均生态容量增长平缓(年平均增长率1.8%),人均生态足迹增长快(年平均增长率达16%),相应的人均生态赤字增长快。This study calculated the ecological footprint and ecological capacity in Chang-Zhu-Tan region from 1986 to 2005 through adjusting the yield factors′ parameters of ecological footprint,which uses the global yield factor instead of the regional one.The results showed that the ecological footprint per capita generally increased,increasing dramatically by 15% each year from 2002 to 2005,and meanwhile the ecological capacity per capita grew gradually and slightly with an annual increase of 2.5%.Similar to the conditions of ecological footprint per capita,the ecological deficit per capita remained steady in the early stage but rose greatly from 2003 to 2005 with an annual increase of 48%.Overall,the ecological footprint expanded much faster than the ecological capacity,bringing out fast growth of ecological deficit.Based on this,we then forecasted the ecological footprint and capacity of Chang-Zhu-Tan region between 2007 and 2015 and fit the relationship between the ecological footprint and time there in the 20 years between 1986 and 2005 in this study.The two methods utilized in this process were the Binomial Curving Forecasting Model and the Grey GM(1.1) Model.When the Grey GM(1.1) Model was used,the average relative error rate of the predicted values of the ecological footprint per capita between 1996 and 2005 was 4.91% while it was 4.41% in the case of Binomial Curving Forecasting Model.Furthermore,the two models were also used in predicting the ecological capacity per capita there during the same time period.It was observed that the average absolute error rate and average relative error rate of the Binomial Curving Forecasting Model were 0.67% and 2.12%,respectively,while they were as 0.53% and 1.67%for the Grey GM(1.1) Model.Thus,it can be concluded that,in the prediction of ecological footprint of Chang-Zhu-Tan region,the Binomial Curving Forecasting Model performance much better compared to the Grey GM(1.1) Model.However,it was inverse when the two models were used to predict the ecological c
分 类 号:X171[环境科学与工程—环境科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38