试论刑事二审抗诉的必要性原则  

On the Principle of Necessity of Appeal against Criminal Trial of Second Instance

作　　者：张蕾蕾 

机构地区：[1]北京市人民检察院第一分院二审监督处,北京100040

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2012年第6期51-53,57,共4页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

摘　　要：2012年新修改的《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》未对检察院的抗诉权作出相关修订,而在司法实践中却存在现行刑法第385条的两条款适用之争,从而影响了法律的统一适用。厘清两条款的关系,关键在于明确第2款系第1款的注意性规定。两条款之争议在司法实践中不宜通过抗诉的途径加以解决,反而应注重运用刑事诉讼具有的谦抑性属性,使抗诉的必要性成为刑事二审抗诉除"确有错误"之外的第2项考量原则,并从错误的性质、程序错误或审判人员违法对实体的影响大小、被害人对判决的态度以及是否具有可替代性纠错途径等角度综合考量抗诉的必要性。In 2012, the new Criminal Procedure Law of the People＇s Republic of China did not give relevant re- vision to the procuratorate＇ s right to appeal, while in the judicial practice, there exists No 385 article of the cur- rent criminal law which is different from it in application. In order to clarify the relationship between the two terms, the key lies in that Acticle 2 is the notice regulation to Article 1. As to the debate between the two terms in the judicial practice, it is expected to adopt the austerity attribute to solve it. In addition, the necessity of ap- peal should be deemed and considered from the nature of the mistake, the program error or judicial personnel＇s influence on the entity law, and the victim＇s attitude to the judgment.

关 键 词：刑事诉讼法 检察院 二审抗诉 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]