检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院 [2]中国刑事诉讼法学研究会 [3]中国政法大学刑事司法学院
出 处:《安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年第1期115-123,共9页Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:刑事强制措施兼有诉讼保障与人权保障的双重功能,其设置与实施均应坚持程序法定原则、必要性原则、比例原则、令状原则,并贯彻司法审查制度。新刑事诉讼法对我国的强制措施制度进行了重大修改,丰富了强制措施的内容,明确和细化了各类强制措施的适用条件与程序,进一步强化了我国强制措施体系的系统性与层次性,总体上符合控制犯罪与保障人权相结合的立法预期;但也存在一些不足与有待商榷之处,需要进一步完善。更为重要的是,在未来的实施过程中,应当准确领会立法意图,明确细化法律规定,并不断探索健全相关配套制度。Criminal coercive measures have the dual function of safeguarding litigation and protecting human rights.Its establishment and implementation should stick to such principles as legality of procedures,necessity,proportionality,writ and judicial review.The new Criminal Procedure Law has made great revisions on criminal coercive measures in China.The content was enriched;application conditions and procedures were clarified and elaborated;its systematicness and hierarchical structure were improved.The revisions conform to the legislative expectation of containing crime and safeguarding human rights.But there are still inadequacies to be improved.More importantly,in future implementation,legislative intents are to be understood accurately;the provisions are to be clarified and elaborated;correlative systems are to be developed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40