检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘阗[1,2] 周会喜[1,2] 黄洁[1,2] 刘芳[1,2]
机构地区:[1]广东省口腔医院 [2]南方医科大学附属口腔医院儿童牙科,广州510280
出 处:《广东医学》2013年第2期202-204,共3页Guangdong Medical Journal
基 金:广东省医学科研基金资助项目(编号:A2009094)
摘 要:目的比较恒前牙外伤冠折后断冠再接和复合树脂直接修复的临床疗效。方法将116颗外伤折断片保留完整的上颌恒前牙分为断冠再接组(65颗)及复合树脂修复组(51颗),分别运用牙釉质-牙本质粘结剂和光固化复合树脂使自体断冠复位再接及光固化复合树脂直接修复,追踪观察2年,进行临床回顾性研究。结果断冠再接组2年的成功率为93.8%,复合树脂修复组2年的成功率为88.2%,两者比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论自体牙断冠再接术和光固化复合树脂直接修复是治疗外伤恒前牙冠折中、短期的成功而有效的过渡性修复的好方法。Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of the permanent anterior tooth restoration by fragment re- attachment and the resin build - up. Methods A total of 116 permanent anterior teeth from 108 patients with intact incis- al edge segments were selected and divided into Group A and B, in which the subjects were treated with reattachment with the enamel - dentin adhesive and the resin composite, and rebuilt - up by the composite resin, respectively. And all cases were assessed clinically with a 2 - year follow - up. Results The success rates in Group A and B were 93.8% and 88.2%, respectively, with no significant difference between them. Conclusion The permanent anterior teeth restoration by fragment reattaehment and resin build - up present are conservative, cost - effective, simple and aesthetic treatments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.132.108