霍兰德职业兴趣测验在大学生职业定位中失效了吗?  

Is Holland's Vocational Interest Test Valid or Not for Undergraduates Vocational Orientation?

作　　者：郭兆明[1] 

机构地区：[1]扬州大学教育科学学院,江苏扬州225002

出　　处：《扬州大学学报（高教研究版）》2012年第6期40-42,共3页Journal of Yangzhou University（Higher Education Study Edition）

基　　金：江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金课题"80年代以来国内师范生质量发展趋势研究"(07SJD880054)

摘　　要：个体不满于人格模式生成的职业是职业定位中常见现象,不应据此否定霍兰德职业兴趣测验的作用。咨询师应了解人格模式、人格模式的特征以及分量表的详细信息;了解职业梦想部分的职业、职业梦想代码以及职业梦想的聚合性;了解评估兴趣与表达兴趣的对等性。咨询师只有在充分利用测验信息的基础上,才能提出合理化建议。It is a common phenomenon that individuals are dissatisfied with the vocation suggested by their personality. But it is not the basis for denying the validity of Holland＇s vocational interest test. Counselors should know about personality mode, its character and the details of subscales. They should then learn about the vocational aspirations and their codes and coherence. Finally, they should understand the congruence between the expressed interests and assessed interests. Only the sugges tions based on sufficient use of the test information can be sound.

关 键 词：霍兰德职业兴趣测验 大学毕业生就业 职业定位 

分 类 号：G448[哲学宗教—心理学] G449[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]