检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫冬梅[1] 任燕[1] 周子璇[1] 贾娇[1] 刘霞[1] 杨红[1] 武克文
机构地区:[1]山西医科大学第一附属医院精神科,太原030001 [2]山西省荣军精神康宁医院
出 处:《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2012年第8期699-701,共3页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基 金:山西省青年科技研究基金项目(2010021036-3);山西省科技攻关项目(20110313012-1)
摘 要:目的 探讨有家族史与无家族史抑郁症患者认知电位P300的特点.方法 选取重性抑郁障碍患者无家族史与有家族史各67例为研究组,选取同期健康志愿者67例为对照组,对所有研究对象进行认知电位P300的检测.结果 ①3组间N2潜伏期差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);其中有家族史抑郁症患者N2潜伏期[(208.40 ±33.05) ms]较无家族史者[(193.55±40.01)ms]及正常组[(189.33±51.13)ms]明显延长,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).②与正常对照组[ (3.38±5.52) μV]相比,无家族史组[ (2.47±1.87) μV]与有家族史组[(2.36±2.10) μV] N2波幅均明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但未发现二组间有明显差异(P>0.05).结论 有家族史与无家族史抑郁症患者均存在认知功能损害,且有家族史者受损更明显.Objective To explore the character of cognitive potential P300 in major depressive disorder ( MDD ) patients between with and without family history and compare the cognitive function between them.Methods Sixty-seven MDD patients with family history and sixty-seven MDD patients without family history were assigned to research group,sixty-seven healthy volunteers were assigned to control group,and ERP P300 detections were conducted in all subjects.Results ①To compare with control group ( ( 189.33 ± 51.13 ) ms) and MDD without family history group( ( 193.55 ± 40.01 )ms),the N2 latency was prolonged more significantly in MDD with family history group ( ( 208.40 ± 33.05 ) ms ) (P 〈 0.05 ).②Compared with control group ( ( 3.38 ± 5.52 ) μV ),the N2 amplitude was decreased more significantly in MDD without ( ( 2.47 ± 1.87 ) μV ) and with family history ( ( 2.36 ± 2.10) μV ),(P 〈 0.05 ).Conclusion There is an obvious cognitive function damaged in the MDD patients with and without family history and the MDD patients with family history are more serious.
分 类 号:R749.4[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117