检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜羡[1] 郭鑫[1] 张郢[1] 钱桂萍[1] 李丽娜[1] 赵阳[1] 陈晓美[1]
机构地区:[1]中国.河北联合大学心理学院,唐山063000
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2013年第2期312-313,共2页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的了解高校退休老人家庭功能与幸福度之间的关系。方法采用家庭亲密度与适应性量表中文版(FACES Ⅱ-CV)和纽芬兰纪念大学幸福度量表(MUNSH)对河北联合大学107名退休老人进行调查。结果不同性别退休老人在幸福度、家庭亲密度和适应性方面无差异;高校退休老人的生活满意程度与幸福度总分存在显著差异(F=11.60,P<0.001),同时与适应性有显著差异(F=6.38,P<0.01),与亲密度有差异(F=3.61,P<0.05);家庭亲密度与老年人的负性情感,负性体验呈显著负相关(P<0.01);家庭适应性与老年人的正性情感显著正相关(P<0.01),与负性情感负相关(P<0.05)。结论老年人对生活满意程度越高,其主观幸福感越高。家庭亲密度和适应性越好,退休老人的自觉幸福度越高。Objective To explore the relationship between family functions and self-conscious happiness of university retired elderly.Methods A total of 107 retired elderly from Hebei United University were measured with the Family Cohesion and Adaptability Scale(FACES II-CV)and Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness(MUNSH).Results Different gender retired elderly had the same feelings in happiness,cohesion and adaptability(P0.05).There were very significant differences in subjective happiness(F=11.60,P0.001)and adaptability(F=3.61,P0.05)between different life satisfaction of university retired elderly.The factors of family cohesion was negatively related to negative emotion and negative experience of retired elderly(r=-0.34,-0.28;P0.01).The factors of family adaptability were significantly positively related to the positive emotion(r=0.23,P0.01),and negatively related to the negative emotion(r=-0.23,P0.05).Conclusion The higher retired elderly feel satisfied with life,the more happiness they get.It'll improve the elders' happiness if they get more attention from family.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30