同伴标准化小班教学在大学生急救培训中效果评价  

First aid training among university students by standard peer education in small groups

作　　者：卢章洪[1] 杜朝晖[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学中南医院重症医学科,湖北430071

出　　处：《中国学校卫生》2013年第1期79-80,84,共3页Chinese Journal of School Health

摘　　要：目的探讨同伴标准化小班教学模式在大学生急救培训中的可行性及有效性,为大学生急救培训方式的选择提供依据。方法将武汉大学2011年参加急救医学通识课程的大学生分为传统教学组(154名)和同伴教学组(142名),比较两组学生在到课率、技能考核合格率、理论考核成绩和课程反馈等方面的差异。结果同伴教学组与传统教学组在到课率(100%vs 82.4%)、技能考核合格率(91.6%vs 76.1%)和理论成绩(88.44分vs 76.97分)差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.01)。在知识记忆和信心方面,同伴教学组也明显优于传统教学组(P值均<0.05)。结论同伴标准化小班教学模式在大学生急救培训中优于传统教学模式,可以进行推广。Objective To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of standardization mode by peer training in small clas- ses. Methods There were 296 non-medical students from Wuhan University recruited in this study.＂ Among them 154 students were assigned in peer training group and 142 students in traditional training group. All the students participated in first aid curricu- lums in 2011. Participation, skill examination, results of the theory test and the course feedbacks were compared as the evaluation indicators between the two groups. Results The results of peer training group and traditional training group were listed as attend- ance {100% vs. 82.4% ）, skill examination pass （91.6% vs. 76.1% }, the scores of theory test （88.44 vs. 76.97}, and for these indicators there were statistically significant differences between the two groups. Furthermore, it showed that the scores of the knowledge memory and the level of confidence in peer training group were significantly higher than those in the traditional training group. Conclusion The standardization mode of peer training in small classes is better than traditional training and can be used in the first aid curriculum.

关 键 词：急救 教育 对比研究 学生 

分 类 号：G479[文化科学—教育学] G426[文化科学—教育技术学]