《奎章政要》真伪及虞、揭关系辨析  

The Authenticity of Kuizhang Zheng Yao and the Relationship between Yu Ji and Jie Xisi

作　　者：邱江宁[1,2,3] 

机构地区：[1]中国社科院文学所 [2]浙江师范大学人文学院 [3]浙江师范大学江南文化研究中心,研究员321004

出　　处：《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》2013年第1期128-135,共8页Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社科基金项目(09YJC751080)中期成果

摘　　要：揭傒斯著《奎章政要》一书的说法,最早见于元末陶宗仪《辍耕录》"奎章政要"条。根据与揭傒斯同时的欧阳玄为揭傒斯写的墓志铭、黄溍为揭傒斯写的神道碑可以确定,《奎章政要》是讹窜揭傒斯的《太平政要》所致。"奎章政要"条的描述逻辑乖谬,基本是杜撰,这与元季人士对虞集、揭傒斯才华的估定以及对他们的熟稔程度有关。人们以揭傒斯在《范先生诗序》中所提供的虞集关于"元诗四家"的诗评为导火索,对虞、揭关系的解读逐渐偏离事实,引发出许多讹谬。The earliest mention of Jie Xisi＇s writing of the book Kuizhang Zheng Yao （《奎章政要》 can be found in Tao Zong yi＇s Chuo Geng Lu （《辍耕录》）. porary Ouyang Xuan and the inscriptions on his Kuizhang Zheng Yao was actually Jie＇s Jie＇s Kuizhang Zheng fact and logic. Tao＇s the talents of and the counts in that regard. From Jie＇s epitaph written by his contem- tombstone written by Huang Jin, we can conclude that Taiping Zheng Yao（ 《太平政要》）. That is to say, the entry of Yao in Chuo Geng Lu was invented by its author Tao Zongyi, which is against the invention is due to the fact that scholars in the late Yuan Dynasty misinterpreted relationship between Yu Ji and Jie Xisi, which gave rise to many misl Their interpretation of the relationship between Yu and Jie is based on foundation of their misunderstanding of Jie＇s review of Yu＇s poems in Fanxiansheng Shi Xu（《范先生诗序》）.

关 键 词：《奎章政要》 《太平政要》 揭傒斯 虞集 《范先生诗序》 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]