检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]海南现代妇婴医院妇产科,海南海口570206 [2]海南医学院附属医院妇产科,海南海口570102
出 处:《海南医学院学报》2013年第2期230-231,共2页Journal of Hainan Medical University
基 金:中国高校医学期刊临床专项资金项目(112210523)~~
摘 要:目的:探讨不孕症诊断治疗仪检测输卵通畅性的临床特点。方法:回顾性分析2008年~2010年接受不孕症诊断治疗仪检测显示输卵管通畅病例91例,其中输卵管通液低压强组(10~17kPa)41例,高压强组(18~26kPa)50例,随诊6个月,比较两组妊娠情况。结果:两组妊娠情况比较,低压强组受孕率65.6%(27/41),高压强组40%(20/50),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。异位妊娠情况比较,低阻力组1例,占2.4%(1/41),高压强组8例,占16%(8/50)。差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:不孕症诊断治疗仪低阻力型受孕率高且有助于预测异位妊娠风险。Objective: To discuss the value of infertility diagnosis instrument in checking fluent status of oviduct. Methods: A total of 91patients who received examination by infertility diagnosis instru- ment during 2005 to 2007 were selected and were divided into two groups based on the hydrotubation. For- ty-one took low-pressure hydrotubation (10-17 kPa), and 50 took the high-pressure hydrotubation(18-26 kPa). They were followed up for 6 months, and pregnancy status were observed and compared. Results: The pregnant rate of low-pressure group was 65% (27/42), while the rate of the high-pressure group was 40%(20/50) , this difference was significant (P〈0.01). There was one case with ectopic gestation in the low-pressure group (2.4 %) and 8 cases in high-pressure group (16 %), with significant difference between two groups (P〈0.01). Oonclusions. The diagnosis rate of this diagnosis instrument is high, and is helpfulin predicting the risk of ectopic pregnancy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.220