检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐明方[1] 卫星[2] 曹慧明[1] 邓红兵[1] 吴钢[1]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态国家重点实验室,北京100085 [2]中国科学院城市环境研究所,福建厦门361021
出 处:《西北大学学报(自然科学版)》2013年第1期127-132,共6页Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:国家环境保护部环保公益性行业科研专项基金资助项目(201009055)
摘 要:目的选取云南省曲靖市麒麟区、陆良县作为研究对象,探析云南省国家可持续发展实验区的整体发展水平。方法基于层次分析法模型,构建云南省国家可持续发展实验区综合评价指标体系并进行定量评价。结果经济发展、社会发展和资源环境准则层的权重比较大,分别为0.234,0.234,0.251;能源利用和科技进步的权重分别为0.130,0.103;公众参与的权重最小,仅为0.048。结论总体上,麒麟区、陆良县两个实验区可持续发展能力逐步增强,在区域可持续发展的实践上都取得了明显的成果,今后应以实现有效的政府主导联动机制、渗透多方加入的公众参与机制和开启全方位监督保障机制,为可持续发展管理的主要方向。Aim Two National Sustainable Communities (Qilin District of Qujing City, and Luliang County) were chosen as objects to explore the overall development level of sustainable development in Yunnan Province. Methods Based on the analysis of AHP model, comprehensive evaluation indicator system was established and quantitative e- valuation was carried out. Results Economic development, social development, and environment resources were given higher weight, which were 0.234, 0. 234 and 0.251. The weights of energy utility and scientific & techno- logical progress were 0. 130 and 0. 103, meanwhile, the weight of public participation was 0.048. Conclusion The ability of sustainable development increased gradually in Qilin District and Luliang County, and achieved re- markable results in the practice of regional sustainable development,which were the linkage government leading, multi-joined public participation mechanism, all-round supervision and and can be the major direction of sustainable development management in the future. system under effective protection mechanism,
关 键 词:国家可持续发展实验区 层次分析法 定量评价
分 类 号:X24[环境科学与工程—环境科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145