检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军第324医院放疗中心,重庆400020
出 处:《临床军医杂志》2013年第2期183-184,共2页Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
摘 要:目的探讨鼻咽癌(NPC)的放疗方式及预后。方法对130例NPC患者临床资料进行回顾性分析。根据放疗方法的不同分为常规放疗(CRT)组100例、伽玛刀(GKS)+CRT组30例,分析不同放疗方法的并发症、局部控制率和生存率。结果 CRT组与GKS+CRT组晚期并发症发生率比较无统计学差异;1、3年生存率分别为99%、90%与96.7%、92%,两组比较均无统计学差异;局部复发率分别为18%、3.3%,两组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论 GKS+CRT治疗鼻咽癌,不增加患者并发症、可减少复发、提高患者生活质量。Objective To study radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and its prognosis. Methods Clinical data of 130 patients with NPC were retrospectively reviewed. According to treatment modalities, the patients were divided into conventional radiotherapy (CRT) group ( n = 100) and gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) plus CRT group ( n = 30 ). Complication rate, survival rate and locally recurrent rate were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in complication rate between CRT group and GKS plus CRT group. The survival rates of the two groups were 99.0% and 96.7% (1-year) and 90.0% and 92.0% (3-year) , respectively, and there were no significant difference, either. The locally recurrent rates were 18.0% in CRT group and 3.3% in GKS plus CRT group, between which there was a significant difference (P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Without increasing complication, GKS plus CRT can reduce locally recurrent rate and improve quality of patients with NPC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117