检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙静锋[1] 赵何伟[1] 郑苏文[1] 王太洪[1] 陆保成[1] 张业伟[1]
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学附属肿瘤医院普外科,江苏南京21009
出 处:《中国肿瘤外科杂志》2013年第1期33-36,共4页Chinese Journal of Surgical Oncology
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.61141013);江苏省自然科学基金资助项目(No.SBK201120268);江苏省医学重点人才资助项目(No.RC2011090);江苏省"333"工程资助项目(No.2011Ⅲ-2640)
摘 要:目的运用Meta分析软件评价胆囊癌根治手术及单纯胆囊切除治疗Ⅱ期胆囊癌的远期疗效。方法通过Pubmed、WOS、万方、维普、中国生物文摘书库检索自1990年1月至2011年12月相关文献,Jadad质量评分评估文献所涉及研究的质量,治疗组为胆囊癌根治术后患者生存人数,对照组为单纯胆囊癌切除术后患者的生存人数,运用Meta分析评估两组患者1、3、5年的生存差异。结果 10篇文献入选病例数共279例,其中根治组146例,单纯切除组133例。Meta分析结果显示:1年生存[OR=3.900,CI=(1.160,13.140),P=0.030],3年生存[OR=2.780,CI=(1.060,7.310),P=0.040],5年生存[OR=3.160,CI=(1.130,8.870),P=0.030],两组差异均有统计学意义。结论同单纯胆囊切除术相比,根治性切除术可提高Ⅱ期胆囊癌术后的1、3、5年生存率。Objective To evaluate the long-term efficacy of radical resection and simple cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer by Meta-analysis. Methods Related articls (1990-2011)were searched in Pubmed, WOS, WANGFANG,VIP, CBM. The qualities of the included studies were evaluated by the Jadad scale. 1-,3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were evaluated by Meta-analysis. Results A total of 10 studies were adopted, and the total number of cases was 279. The Meta-analysis showed that : 1-year OS rate [ OR = 3. 900, C1 = ( 1. 160,13. 140),P=O. O30J ,there was a significant difference between the two groups;3-year OS rate[ OR =2. 780,CI= (1. 060,7. 310) ,P =0.040] ,difference between the two groups was significant ;5-year OS rate [ OR = 3. 160, CI = ( 1. 130,8. 870 ) , P = 0. 030 ] , significant difference between the two groups was observed. Con- dusions Comparing radical-section with simple-cholecystectomy,radical-section can improve 1-,3- and 5-year OS rates.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49