检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:辛艳[1] 王瑄[1] 邱野[1] 李德利[1] 赵倩[1]
出 处:《水土保持学报》2013年第1期27-30,共4页Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
基 金:辽宁省自然科学基金项目(201102193);辽宁省教育厅项目(L2010496)
摘 要:在天然降雨条件下,研究传统耕作、免耕、免耕秸秆覆盖、横垄4种耕作方式对坡耕地水土流失和养分流失的影响效果。结果表明:与传统耕作相比,其他3种耕作方式均能减少水土流失,产流量分别较之减少19.3%,27.1%,31.8%,泥沙量对应减少12.4%,21.5%,57.8%;各耕作小区径流中养分流失量差异显著;泥沙中全磷流失特征为T1>T3>T2>T4,其他耕作小区比传统耕作小区减少流失依次为8.6%,5.1%,12.1%;泥沙中的全氮流失特征为T1>T2>T3>T4,其他耕作小区比传统耕作小区减少流失依次为6.4%,10.3%,34.3%。坡耕地土壤侵蚀量与径流量呈显著相关。The effects of four agricultural tillage modes including conventional tillage, no-till, no-till and straw mulching, cross-plowing tillage were studied on soil, water and N, P nutrient loss on sloping croplands under natural rainfall in Liaoning province. The result showed that the other tillage modes did better than conventional tillage in decreasing the loss of runoff and sediments. As compared to the conventional tillage, the others tillage modes decreased the runoff 19.3%, 27.1%, 31.8% and decreased the sedimentation 12.4%, 21.5%, 57.8%. The differences in the loss of the nutrients in different tillage were significant in runoff. The character of the loss of total phosphorus was TI〉T3〉T2〉T4. The character of the loss of total nitrogen was T1〉 T2〉T3〉T4. As compared to the conventional tillage, the others tillage modes decreased the TP 8.6%, 5.1%, 12.1%, decreased the TN 6.4%, 10.3%, 34.3%. The differences between the runoff and sediments were significant.
分 类 号:S157.1[农业科学—土壤学] S157.2[农业科学—农业基础科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.121