检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周扬帆[1]
出 处:《湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第1期93-96,共4页Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Social Sciences)
摘 要:诉讼欺诈的存在,不仅侵害相对人的合法权益,使行为人获得不正当利益,而且浪费司法资源,损害司法的公信力与权威,具有社会危害性,应当受到刑法的处罚。对于诉讼欺诈的定性,尽管有学者认为符合诈骗罪的犯罪构成,或构成敲诈勒索罪,或应以其他犯罪论处,或者作无罪化处理,但是考虑到现行刑法罪名以及最高人民法院的答复都无法全面保护诉讼欺诈行为所侵犯的法益,可以在妨害司法罪一章节中新增"诉讼欺诈罪"这一新罪名,以有效规制诉讼欺诈行为。Litigation fraud violates the legitimate rights of the relative person, causes the behavior of people to obtain illegitimate interests ,wastes judicial resources and damage the credibility and authority of the judiciary, it is harmful to society and should be subjected to criminal punishment. Scholars hold various opinions for the definitions of litigation fraud. Some argue that constitute fraud in lawsuit was in accordance with the crime of fraud, and some argue that it was in accordance with the crime of extortion, still some people thought the act of litigation fraud should be punished as other crime or treated as no guilty. Since present criminal law and the Supreme People's Court can not protect the right from litigation fraud, a new accuse of litigation fraud should be added in the chapter of crime of obstruction of justice to efficiently restrict the litigation fraud.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49