血液的法律属性及其侵权责任归责原则刍议——兼论《侵权责任法》中“不合格血液”问题  

Discussion on Law Property of Blood and the Principle of Attributable to the Tort Liability:On "Substandard Blood" in "Tort Liability Act"

作　　者：马家忠[1] 田侃[1] 邵振[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京中医药大学,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《医学与哲学（A）》2013年第1期68-70,共3页Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition

基　　金：2010年卫生部政策法规司卫生法制专项基金“医疗机构医疗产品缺陷损害责任风险与防范研究”的研究成果.

摘　　要：通过对血液法律属性的法理分析,得出血液归属于产品或非产品均有可能不利于衡平各方权益的结论。立足《侵权责任法》等法律基础,分析责任归责原则,认为在严格责任原则基础上,适当考虑公平责任原则,可以较好地解决血液法律属性分歧所带来的司法困惑,能有效维护各方权益。Through legal analysis of the legal property of blood, the thesis draws the conclusion that it will be against the equity of all parties’ interests no matter the blood is assigned to product or non-product. However, based on the principle of the “Tort Liability Act”, analysis of the principle of liability, strict obligation principle, and considering principle of equitable responsibility, the judicial dilemma caused by difference of legal property of blood could be solved, and the solution will act on behalf of every party effectively.

关 键 词：不合格血液 侵权责任 法律属性 归责原则 

分 类 号：R-05[医药卫生] D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]