检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柳喜洋[1] 宋波 张蕾[1] 张明智[1] 汪变红[1] 马阳阳[1] 胡腾鹏[1]
机构地区:[1]郑州大学第一附属医院肿瘤内科,河南郑州450052 [2]信阳市中心医院肿瘤内科,河南信阳464000
出 处:《中华肿瘤防治杂志》2013年第3期217-220,共4页Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
摘 要:目的:检测CD5蛋白在弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的表达情况,并探讨CD5表达与临床病理特征及疗效的关系。方法:采用免疫组化方法(ElivisionTM法)检测232例患者中CD5蛋白的表达,回顾性研究CD5阳性表达DLBCL与CD5阴性表达DLBCL患者的临床病理特征及化疗效果,运用χ2检验比较两者差异。结果:232例DLBCL患者中,CD5阳性表达率19.8%(46/232)。DLBCL中,CD5表达与年龄(χ2=61.061,P=0.001)、性别(χ2=92.115,P=0.001)、分期(χ2=47.508,P=0.001)、KPS评分(χ2=42.178,P=0.001)、B症状(发热、乏力、盗汗和消瘦,χ2=56.344,P=0.001)、血清LDH水平(χ2=33.341,P=0.001)以及侵犯部位(χ2=78.123,P=0.001)相关;而与血清β2-MG水平无关,χ2=2.495,P=0.138。46例CD5表达阳性的患者中,6例化疗有效,有效率为13.0%(6/46);而186例CD5表达阴性DLBCL患者中,131例患者化疗有效,有效率为70.4%(131/186)。两者比较差异有统计学意义,χ2=50.227,P<0.05。结论:CD5阳性表达的DLBCL好发于老年女性,侵袭性高;CD5阳性表达DLBCL患者比CD5阴性表达的患者疗效差。OBJECTIVE: To test the expression of the CD5 protein in the diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma(DLBCL), and analyze the relation between the expression of the CD5 protein and the clinicopatbologic features and therapeutic effect of DLBCL. METHODS: Using immunohistochemical methods (ElivisionTM Method)the CD5 protein expression was detec- ted and the clinicopathologic features and therapeutic effect of DLBCL were studied retrospectively. X^2 test was used to compare the differences between them. RESULTS: In all the 232 DLBCL patients, the positive rate of CD5 was 19.8% (46/232). In DLBCL , CDS-positive expression was related to age(X^2 = 61. 061, P = 0. 001), sex ( 2 = 92. 115, P = 0. 001) ,stage (X^2 =47. 508,P=0. 001) ,KPS score (X^2 =42. 178,P=0. 001) ,B symptoms (fever ,fatigue ,night swea- ting, marasmus,X^2 = 56. 344, P = 0.001 ), serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level (X^2 = 33.341, P = 0. 001 ), the inva- ding sites (X^2= 78. 123, P= 0. 001). There were significant differences among them, but was not associated with the serum level of β2-MG, X^2= 2. 495,P= 0. 138. Of all the 46 CDS-positive expression DLBCL, 6 patients reached PR, CRu or CR, the therapeutic effective rate was 13.0% (6/46), while of the 186 patients with CD5-negative expression DLBCL, β1 pa- tients reached PR,CRu or CR , the therapeutic effective rate was 70.4% (131/186). There was a significant difference be- tween them (X^2= 50. 227,P〈0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DLBCLs with CD5 positive expression are dominated in elderly fe- male,and more aggressive. DLBCL with CD5 positive expression has poorer therapeutic effect compared to CD5 negative expression.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229